The
Argument in a Nutshell
- Electronic money is private money, and is less
"tied" to territory than money in the past,
which I will call "national money." It is
replacing national money.
- National money is so closely tied to the evolution of the
nation state that the decline of one means the decline of
the other.
- Electronic money undermines national money because it can
move quickly and easily to and from offshore havens that
are outside national jurisdiction.
- This sets in motion a competitive deregulation dynamic
that weakens the nation state. The dynamic has occurred
at the level of wholesale finance, and is starting to
occur at the levels of retail finance and electronic
commerce.
- To the extent that regulation of electronic money is
desirable, it will only work at the supranational or
international levels. The nation state is no longer very
effective at dealing with electronic money.
- Though I am not taking a hard-line technologically
determinist view, I do believe that communication and
transportation technology contributes to defining the
size and shape of effective political entities. The
computer and telecommunications revolution is expanding
the size of effective political entities to a more global
level, in place of the national entities that were
defined by railways, telegraphs, newspapers, radio, etc.
[Return to
Privatization of Money summary]
© 1996 Richard McGuire